Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Nakashima vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Etcheverry analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.39% of points on his second serve, while Etcheverry has won 51.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 47.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Etcheverry has won 48.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.66% and 28.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 69.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Etcheverry has saved 64.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 50/ 32), with Etcheverry winning 51.67% (W/L 31/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 26/ 25). Etcheverry has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 284/ 144), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/ 9), where as Etcheverry has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 15/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakashima winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 1 and Etcheverry winning 2. The last match between Nakashima and Etcheverry was at the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona, 18-04-2024, Third, Clay with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Etcheverry have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakashima winning 0 times and Etcheverry 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 0, and Etcheverry 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.22 while Etcheverry has played against players with an average rank of 132.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Etcheverry has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Etcheverry has converted 36.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 0 - 1 Etcheverry
72
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
28
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
61% (190-119)
Career Total W/L
64% (326-187)
71% (32-13)
YTD W/L
50% (13-13)
$1,648,985
Career Prize Money
$1,859,050
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nakashima VS Etcheverry H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Tomas Martin Etcheverry |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:10:0 | 3:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (77/125) | 67% (62/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (53/77) | 77% (48/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (26/48) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 17% (2/12) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (31/93) | 37% (46/125) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Nakashima VS Etcheverry H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Tomas Martin Etcheverry |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (32/13) | 50% (13/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (66/34) | 53% (31/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (556/471) | 51% (307/299) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 55% (11/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.68 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 341 | 123 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:41 | 2:3:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.22 | 128.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2094/3246) | 68% (1261/1857) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1563/2094) | 70% (877/1261) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (653/1152) | 51% (304/596) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (93/278) | 36% (62/170) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1245/3383) | 36% (677/1866) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 64% (7/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 57% (8/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (21/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (31/44) | 48% (10/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (16/24) | 46% (6/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (30/27) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (30/3) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 9% (11/1) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reda Bennani
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
84%
(
21 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
8 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
8
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Cameron Norrie
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nick Hardt
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nakashima Vs Etcheverry Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
